An Example Of The “Sugar And Spice And Everything Nice” Is Bullshit.


Yet another example of how women perpetrate crimes as much as men. Now, while I believe that the woman in question, when she has been found, will probably, in some way, claim that it was a man that caused her to do it. I will say that it will be just feminist nonsense. The woman did it, and that is all there is to it. And she, most likely, will get a less harsh sentence than a man because she is a woman, that is an inequity that has been around for a very long time.


FullSizeRender


“Woman robs Moorhead Tesoro in daylight stick-up
By Forum staff reports on Oct 23, 2014 at 8:24 p.m.

MOORHEAD – A woman robbed a downtown gas station here on Thursday morning in a rare daylight stick-up, making off with an undisclosed amount of cash, police say.

At about 11 a.m., a woman in her 20s later identified as being Native American walked into the Tesoro at 104 8th St. S. and displayed a silver-colored weapon in her left hand, Lt. Tory Jacobson said in a news release.

The woman, who may have been wielding a knife, demanded cash, Jacobson said in an interview at the robbery scene Thursday.

Witnesses had last seen the suspect on foot heading east on Main Avenue and then south down 13th Street, police said shortly before 3 p.m.

The woman was wearing a dark hoodie, multicolored pajama pants and a white cloth scarf over her face to conceal her identity, Jacobson said in the release.

Several customers were at the gas pumps outside the store during the robbery, and the clerk wasn’t injured, Jacobson said in the release.

Police wouldn’t say how much money the suspect took in the robbery.

Anyone with information is asked to call the Red River Regional Dispatch Center at (701) 451-7660 and ask to speak with an on-duty supervisor for Moorhead police.” {http://www.inforum.com/content/woman-robs-moorhead-tesoro-daylight-stick}

Is Feminism A Hate Group?


stand_up_against_the_feminist_hate_group_t_shirt-rb238f3134bbe4e748cd86b04f20c6958_8nhma_512

From my perspective, and in my experience, feminism, by that I mean gender-feminism, is, indeed, a hate group. Now, the gender-feminists will insist that it did not start as a hate group, however, in some of my posts, we can see that gender-feminism is, and has always been, a hate group, for the most part. However, there are some outliers that are equity-feminists, and they have not bought into the hatred.

One of these equity-feminists is Christina Hoff Sommers {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers}

So, when I speak of that particular hate-group it is the gender-feminists of which I speak.

Now, does anyone know about Erin Pizzey? {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey} She was the first person in the world to start the first women’s shelters in the UK, Canada, and the USA. And her findings shortly after that first women’s shelter had started was that most domestic violence is reciprocal, and that women are equally as capable of violence as men. And, of course, the gender-feminists didn’t like what Pizzey and said and has been the recipients of many death threats because of that. Additionally, she is still receiving death threats even today.

So, that says a great deal of the character, or lack thereof, of some gender-feminists. So much hatred to another women probably tells us much concerning the level of hatred towards everyone who is not a gender-feminist. Also, Pizzey has written a book entitled “From the Personal to the Political” wherein she has asked the question who are the victims, the women or the men?

Also, you should understand that Pizzey does not possess a right-wing frame of reference. She is a social activist who has seen how women really are. And she carries a great deal of weight with her respectability, and because she has been surrounded by feminism ever since feminism existed, her opinion is trustworthy.

Additionally, we can say more about feminism since, for non-gender-feminists, feminism encourages, or creates, negative emotions. Kenneth Minogue, currently dead, was an Emeritus Professor of Political Science and Honorary Fellow at the London School of Economics. {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Minogue} In his article entitled “How civilizations fall” refers to refers to “Betty Friedan’s radical feminists” as a “new tribe” established in the 1960’s. He then notes that “The first task of this new movement was to create the shared consciousness necessary for tribal functioning. Like all forms of psychic collectivism, ‘consciousness raising’ (as it is known) exploits indignation and cultivates righteousness”. He further notes that these feelings of “indignation” and “righteousness” form the bitter root that springs up into seething anger and even (dare I say it) hatred in many feminists. Feminism plays up women’s alleged inferior status in Western society to generate anger, and that anger becomes the motivation for feminist activism. It also slides easily into hate. {http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/civilizationsfall-minogue-2203}

So, feminism, or at least gender-feminism, is just more than the idea that women should the same opportunities as men. Indeed, it is an ideology that forms battle lines between women against men in a struggle for power. And I admit that in history men have held power, and some men did harm women. However, the feminists that want all of the control is based upon flattery. Women, the feminists have revealed, are marvelously talented set of people who have been suppressed throughout all of history by the evil male “patriarchy”. We have been told that men are the enemy, that men are evil, that men have subjugated women, and that women must break free from their bondage. {http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/civilizationsfall-minogue-2203}

And that attitude, in my opinion and in my observation, is what makes feminism, or gender-feminism, a hate group.

But, because feminism has been favored by the media and the politicians, including Obama, it is a very difficult thing to fight.

The mens movement is still young, and it is going to a long time to turn the tide. And I will be dead before men and women are equal. I certainly hope that any of the people who read my posts are free before you die.

Also, I should like to note that I have, somehow, broken my email capabilities. I shall fix these problems in the fullness of time.

Women Who Have Tattoos And Piercings Are Broken


This may may sound somewhat weird, cruel, and somewhat judgmental, however, I believe that this a factually true.

tattoo-woman_2123567i

There are people that have tattoos and piercings, and I will say, that in my opinion, this does not, in any way, shape, or form, make the women make the woman more attractive. Period.

I do not thing that any man has ever thought that a particular women would make her look sexier. I cannot see that a man would say, “that woman would look really hot if she had a butterfly tattooed over her ass”. Yet, for some reason, women tend to put ink within their skin, or wear piece of metal on her nose. But, yet, many women do that very thing.

As a matter of fact, there are more women than men with tattoos.

I should point out that, in my opinion and observation, we should treat these women with tattoos or those who have extraneous piercings as lepers.

These women are sluts.

Lets face it, what kind of woman would be comfortable lying down in public while a fat guy with a dirty beard sticks a sharp needle into her skin? The kind of woman who takes sharp objects in her vagina as a hobby. {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153289} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22616886} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22726901}

These women have no foresight.

Even in today’s society, people with piercings have a hard time getting hired for anything even for the menial jobs. And what is going to happen to these women as time marches on and all those cool things that, you think, look so cool and individual, start sagging and wrinkling in your 50’s and beyond.Seriously, what the fuck were you thinking? {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1781185} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153289} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12042538} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119003} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24926092}

These women are selfish.

These women get these things done to themselves to identify themselves as individuals, just like everyone else. They do these things for themselves, in other words, “I AM DOING THIS FOR ME!”. A woman who disfigure herself will never attempt to please anyone or do anything nice for another person. {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1781185} {http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715204734.htm} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12042538}

These women are boring.

Seriously. Yes, these people have tattoos and piercings, and they imagine that that fact will make them naturally interesting. So, why should they bother having anything other than that fact? Most women tend to be as boring as dirt, although a pierced/tattooed woman is aggressively boring as dirt. {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19651696} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23938068}

These women are mentally ill.

Really. Any women who imagines that getting a tattoo or a piercing is a good idea, even a seemingly innocuous one, is going to be more than a little bit crazy. In my experience, every pierced or inked woman has never been right in the head. Some were clinically depressed. Some suffered from anxiety of even full-blown personality disorder. I have known a psychopath who was inked. {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153289} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12042538} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2333825} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119003} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23938068} {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22726901}

Again, this is my opinion. If you do not like what I have said, then you can email me at:

kissmyass@don’t_care.com

 

If You Shave, Here Is A Suggestion.


Let us discuss about how I shave my beard.

burkebymead

I remember before I was able to shave there were straight razors and single-bladed safety razors, and that was all there were. Then some bunch of idiot advertising executives decided that it would be a good idea to stick two razor blades in a single razor.

When that first happened, I recall two pieces of humorous fiction that were quite funny. The first was a fake advertisement on Saturday Night Live during around 1980, it was a commentary on the two-bladed razors that had just come out in 1971, with the Gillette Trac II “razor system”. The punch line was something to the effect that if you thing that a dual blade is a good idea, then you believe anything.

The second was in MAD Magazine, where they proposed a fictional razor three-bladed razor where the first blade stretched the whisker, the second blade cut the whisker, and the third blade tied the cut whiskers into tiny bundles.

I had actually used the dual blade razors until, in 1998, Gillette produced the Mach3. Yes, it was a triple bladed razor. At the time, I could still get dual bladed razors with no problem, and I bought a bunch of them. Then, around 2004, I had to get some more razors, and I had seen razors with 4, yes FOUR, blades.

In my opinion, I knew that the dual blades were all hype, but they were convenient. But, I could not tolerate these 3, 4, and I imagine 5 bladed razors. At that point I had made a decision. I knew that when you need to get shaved in a hospital, for surgery for example, they use a single bladed razor. And I started to think about it.

In 2004, I bought my first single-bladed safety razor. I should have used the single-bladed safety razor all along. I get a smoother shave than any dual-bladed, triple-bladed, and any n-bladed razor. And while some of you out there might think that I am still living in the past for using an old-fashion razor. I really don’t care what you think about it. I buy my razors on amazon.com, and once you have purchased the handle, they are amazingly cheap, cheaper than any other style of razor out there. Now, additionally, I use a mug with shaving soap. And I assure you that regular soap in NO GOOD, you need shaving soap, because it will not dry your skin lake hand soap does.

So what is the cost for my shaving setup?
Blades will generally cost you about $5.99 for ten blades
Shaving soap will cost you about $4.00
A mug and brush will cost you about $20.00 and that will last for years
A handle for you blades will cost $20.00 or more, but that will last you until you die, and you can pass it on to you grandkids.

So, for an initial outlay of about $50.00, you can start shaving like a real man. You need to replace you blades periodically, and your soap, and maybe a new brush every ten years, but, in my opinion, it is a morning ritual that you should probably consider.

Now, I have been looking into buying a straight razor, but I cannot find a good one, yet.

Also, because I live in North Dakota, where it is cold, I grow my beard starting in September, and I will start shaving again in March. It’s just something I do.

Let Us Talk About “Man Caves”


I have a, so called, “Man Cave”. In my particular case, it is my entire apartment. Of course I am happily divorced and have not been influenced by a woman as of November 2013.

teddyresolution

So, what is a “Man Cave”?

According to Wikipedia {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_cave}, it is a male sanctuary, or safe space for a man. It is, essentially, the last bastion of masculinity.

Now, that face that there is a room for a man seems to be somewhat upsetting, to me. See, a man’s domain is outside the home, the place where he acts and interacts. The woman’s domain is within the home, where she sets everything up the way she wants. The fact that within the home a man has been reduced to a single small space within the home tells me that within the home, she is in charge. And that tells me that there is no equality within a male-female relationship.

So, if we are lucky enough to have a man cave, that is where we go to be away from women. We may be “recharged” and exit refreshed. So, if you do have a man cave, then you are lucky. I was not so lucky during my marriage, as she had set everything up the way she wanted, and I had no real say within the home.

For a few years, I had brewed beer within the home, and my ex-wife had tolerated it, but all of the brewing equipment was generally hidden and out of sight. The fermenters were hidden in a closet, when I had finished with bottling, the cases of freshly bottled beer was hidden in a corner. See, it was never really “our” home, it was “her” home, and in her opinion I was messing it up with me having my things, my hobbies, being present in “our” home.

And about a year and a half after our divorce, after I had moved to Fargo, North Dakota, yesterday, on 14 October 2014, I had realized that my entire apartment was my man cave, my safe space. And as I looked around at my nominal things, I knew that it was, indeed, a man cave.

So, what the hell is in my man cave?

I have three computers, four bookshelves, CDs and DVDs scattered in one of my three desks/tables. I have a humidor on my kitchen counter, since about one-half of my kitchen counter is full of manly things. Yes, I share my space with two cats, and I have some places for my cats in the man cave, but if I wanted to, I could move these cat things in another room. But I have been around these cats for so long (17 years and 11 years) that I am OK with them in my man cave.

So, do you have a man cave? If so, what is in it? If you do not have a man cave, why?


Some other resources:

{http://www.mancavesite.org/}

{http://mancavemarket.com/}

{http://www.oddee.com/item_97008.aspx}

{http://www.houzz.com/man-cave/}

{http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/personal/05/02/mantuary.marriage/index.html}

{http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2007-01-03-manspace_x.htm}

{http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/hotproperty/archives/2006/12/wheres_your_man.html}

{http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2007-06-03/news/0705311645_1_space-women-s-movement-manly}

{http://www.nj.com/hobokennow/index.ssf/2008/03/ghdghfjhg.html}

{http://www.canada.com/topics/lifestyle/style/story.html?id=1957a80a-1e62-4e33-8523-2b34ff96a125&k=52169}

{http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=man+cave}

{http://www.artofmanliness.com/2010/07/27/famous-man-caves/}

{http://www.artofmanliness.com/2011/08/19/how-to-decorate-a-man-room/}

{http://community.artofmanliness.com/group/aommancave}

{http://www.pinterest.com/pin/123075002290510532/}

{http://www.renov8er.com/2014/04/09/manly-man-cave/}

{http://pc.blogspot.com/2010/08/worlds-best-man-caves.html}

{http://mancaved.com/18-wall-decor-ideas-man-cave/}

Part 10: Myths About Domestic Violence


I wish to now discuss about how domestic violence affects children and parents.


 

stop-violence


Myth: Abusive parents are more likely to seek sole custody of the child/children than non-violent parents.

Fact: Unfortunately, this statistic is very probably wrong. This claim is derived from an American Psychological Association (APA) publication that contains numerous claims that have no scientific basis. {American Psychological Association. Violence and the Family:  Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family. Washington, DC. 1996.} This task force that had published this publication was headed by Lenore Walker  {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenore_E._Walker} who was instrumental in The Super Bowl Hoax. The APA has now been withdrawn. {Communication with Julia Silva, Director, APA Adults and Children Working Together Against Violence Office, January 31, 2008.}


Myth: From 25% to 50% of disputed custody cases involve domestic violence.

Fact: While many custody cases involve an allegation of domestic violence, only a very small minority of those allegations have been substantiated as being true. In many divorces, the women makes a false claim of domestic violence so that the record shows that there is an allegation, but without demonstrating it. This is a common tactic that has been used for many years.


Myth: False allegations of domestic violence are no more common in a divorce or custody disputes than at any other time.

Fact: False allegations of domestic violence or sexual abuse appears far more common during custody disputes. {Trocme N, Bala N. False allegations of abuse and neglect when parents separate. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 29, 2005. p. 1341.}


Myth: Children are safer with their mother than with their father.

Fact: According to the data provided by the Department of Health and Human Services, 71%, yes seventy-one percent, of children killed by one parent were killed by their mothers. {Rosenthal, M., 71% of children killed by one parent are killed by their mothers; 60% of victims are boys. 2008. http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php}


Myth: Abusive fathers are successful in winning sole child custody approximately 70% of the time.

Fact: This false statistic appears in an embellishment of a claim in a 1989 report by The Gender Bias Committee of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court which had claimed that in 70% of cases, the fathers, not the abusive fathers, were successful in winning some form of child custody. However, the was not necessarily physical custody, nor was it sole custody. {Abrams and Greaney, Gender Bias Study of the Supreme Judicial Court, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1989.} However, when that data had been re-analyzed, they concluded that “when mothers sought sole custody, the court granted the request at a rate 65% higher than it did when fathers made the same request.” {Rosenthal M. Misrepresentation of gender bias in the 1989 Report of the Gender Bias Committee of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. November 23, 2005. http://www.breakingthescience.org/SJC_GBC_analysis_intro.php#mbr_analysis}


Myth: Allegations of domestic violence have no demonstrated effect on the rate at which persons are awarded custody of their children.

Fact: This claim has been refuted by a study that found judges were more likely to award sole custody to non-perpetrators of domestic violence. {Morril A, Dai J, Dunn S, Sung I, Smith K. Child custody and visitation decisions when the father has perpetrated violence against the mother. Violence Against Women, Vol. 11, No. 8, 2005.}


OK. That is all I have, and I am done with this series. If anyone notices a bad link that I have given you on this series of posts, please tell me and I will attempt to correct them.

I am going to not post for about two or three days, as my brain hurts!

 

 

 

Part 09: Myths About Domestic Violence


Let us now concentrate on how domestic violence affects the workplace.


 

stop-violence


Myth: According to the General Accounting Office (GAO), an independent agency that to the United States Congress audit, evaluation, and investigative services, between one-quarter and one-half of domestic violence victims reported that they had lost a job due to, at least in part, domestic violence.

Fact: The GAO, in HR 739 had stated a very different conclusion. The actual conclusion was “we cannot conclude that being a victim of domestic violence changes the likelihood that a woman will work {GAO: Domestic Violence Prevalence and Implications for Employment among Welfare Recipients. GAO/HEHS-99-12. November 1998. www.gao.gov/archive/1999/he99012.pdf}


Myth:  Between 32% and 56% of employed women are harassed at work by their abusive partners.

Fact: This claim from HR 739 was based upon three, small, uncontrolled, and outdated studies that had absolutely no scientific validity. The respondents of the studies had represented a highly selected population of women in abuse shelters and the results are based on unverified self-reports. {GAO: Domestic Violence Prevalence and Implications for Employment among Welfare Recipients. GAO/HEHS-99-12. November 1998. Appendix III. http://www.gao.gov/archive/1999/he99012.pdf}


Myth: Females of domestic violence lose 8,000,000 days of paid work every year. Yes, I said 8 million.

Fact: This, again, comes from HR 739, and it originates from the Center of Disease Control is a one-sided statistic that does not include any mention of male victims of domestic violence. {National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Costs of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the United States, Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pub/IPV_cost.html}


Myth: Homicide is the leading cause of death for women on the job.

Fact: Yet another claim from HR 739. However, the leading cause amongst women of death in the workplace is transportation incidents at 43%. Homicides represent 35% of women in the workplace. {NIOSH: Violence in the Workplace: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/violence/traumaviol_research.html}


Well, that is all I have for now, in my next part, I will be focussing on children and custody. And I think that will be the last part of this series.